Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The principle of respecting patient autonomy underpins the concept and practice of informed consent. Yet current approaches to consent often ignore the ways in which the exercise of autonomy is deeply epistemically dependent. In this paper, we draw on philosophical descriptions of autonomy “scaffolding” and apply them to informed consent in medicine. We examine how this relates to other models of the doctor patient relationship and other theories (for example, the notion of relational autonomy). A focus on scaffolding autonomy reframes the justification for existing ways of supporting decisions. In other cases, it suggests a need to rethink how, when and where professionals obtain consent. It may highlight the benefit of technology for supporting decisions. Finally, we consider the implications for some high-stakes decisions where autonomy is thought to be critical, for example termination of pregnancy. We argue that such decisions should not be free from all sources of influence – rather that they should be protected from undesired influence.

Type

Journal article

Journal

Journal of Medical Ethics

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group

Publication Date

03/12/2024